Class, before I begin my explanation as to how our nation was plunged into financial ruin by a combination of Wall-Street and both the Democrats and Republicans in the White house from 1999 to 2008 (yes, that includes Golden Boy Bill Clinton), I would like to prep you with some "of the day" lessons.
If you followed the link and did some reading on your own, you would find out the following...
"create unnecessary regulatory burden" -OR- Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to lend financial backing, the chance for government to make(lose) money in the financial sector, and making up a CRA rating system for banks so government could provide an illusion of accountability.
Year Passed: 1977
Who Passed: Jimmy Carter Administration and the 95th U.S. Congress (both chambers were a Democratic Majority)
What it entailed: It encouraged commercial banks and savings associations to stop redlining practices and lend money to their surrounding communities, mainly low-moderate income neighborhoods providing that is it is monitored by the Fed to ensure "safe and sound operation"
Criticism -OR- What it meant to potential exploiters
"distort credit markets" - OR - expansion into risky investing like Securities and Derivatives"create unnecessary regulatory burden" -OR- Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to lend financial backing, the chance for government to make(lose) money in the financial sector, and making up a CRA rating system for banks so government could provide an illusion of accountability.
"lead to unsound lending" -OR- pave the way for unregulated predatory lending (What happened to the CRA rating system?)
"cause the governmental agencies charged with implementing the law to allocate credit"-OR- Government was asking for the banks to lend in the first place, and also promising oversight in lending practices. Why wouldn't financial institutions expect a bailout from government, especially with participation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
Think about it kids.
Think about it kids.
No comments:
Post a Comment